State v. Powell
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LAGARDE, Justice.
The State of Texas appeals the trial court’s dismissal of the indictment pursuant to the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act (IADA). See Tex.Code CRIM. PROC. Ann. art. 51.14 (Vernon 1979). In four points of error, the State contends that the trial court erred in dismissing the indictment because: (1) the 180-day time limit had not expired because appellee had not properly triggered the running of the time under the statute; (2) the delay in bringing appellee to trial was agreed to by appellee or his counsel; (3) the trial court included in its calculations a period…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fex v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Petrick v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992
- Burton v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991
- Bell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Morganfield v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996
3Cited by14 opinions
- Donald F. Huff v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2015
- Lindley v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2000
- Arthur Alexander Office v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2018
- Bob Harold Leach v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004
- Chauhan, Vikram S.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2015
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.