Legal Opinion

Cantu v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided May 7, 1999No. 01-97-01356-CRPublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SAM NUCHIA, Justice.

Appellant, Davi Cantu, Jr., was indicted for indecency with a child. Appellant pled guilty without an agreed recommendation, and the tidal court assessed appellant eight years confinement. Appellant filed a pro se request for leave to appeal, which the trial court granted.

DISCUSSION

Deprivation of Effective Assistance of Counsel

In point of error two, appellant asserts he was deprived of counsel following sentencing, and was therefore unable to file a motion for new trial because the trial court did not appoint appellate counsel until more than thirty days had passed…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  2. Gamble v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1996
  3. Oldham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  4. Flowers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  5. Ward v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Coronado v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2000
  2. Houston v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
  3. Aldrich v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2001
  4. Brown v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2000
  5. Scott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2002

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API