Spiska Engineering, Inc. v. SPM Thermo-Shield, Inc.
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERTSON, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1.] SPM Thermo-Shield, Inc. appeals a judgment of the circuit court affirming the decision of an arbitrator and denying a motion to vacate the arbitration award. We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
[¶ 2.] On August 3, 1994, Thermo-Shield entered into an Agreement with Spiska Engineering, Inc. Under this Agreement, Spiska was designated as the exclusive distributor of Thermo-Shield products in several European countries. Subsequent addendums and supplements to the Agreement granted Spiska additional territories and the right to mix raw Thermo-Shield material instead of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Pesicka v. PesickaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Boise Cascade Corporation v. Paper Allied-Industrial, Chemical and Energy Workers (Pace), Local 7-0159Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- Stanley A. Klopp, Inc. v. John Deere Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Nelson v. SchellpfefferSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Charlson v. CharlsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- DT-Trak Consulting, Inc. v. PrueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Spiska Engineering, Inc. v. SPM Thermo-Shield, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Konrad v. StoebnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- Nelson v. Estate of CampbellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.