Legal Opinion

DT-Trak Consulting, Inc. v. Prue

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 2012No. 26065PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERTSON, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1.] Dan Prue sold his majority interest in DT-Trak Consulting, Inc. (DT-Trak), a medical coding business, for a lump-sum payment and several annual payments. DT-Trak withheld an annual payment, asserting that Prue had violated the Stock Purchase Agreement. The matter proceeded to arbitration. A three- member arbitration panel made an award in Prue’s favor. DT-Trak sought to vacate the award, alleging that the arbitrator it selected demonstrated evident partiality, and that the panel’s findings of fact and conclusions of law were insufficient. The circuit court…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Perry v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Agfirst Farmers Coop v. Diamond C DairySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Luze v. New Fb Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Agfirst Farmers Cooperative v. Diamond C Dairy, LLCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API