Legal Opinion
Konrad v. Stoebner
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided November 2, 2016No. 27772PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR, Justice., [¶ 1.] In this appeal of the circuit court’s confirmation of an arbitration award, we determine whether the arbitrator exceeded his powers. We affirm.
Background
[¶ 2.] Thomas Konrad and Myron and Patricia Stoebner entered into a contract for the sale of real property on December 30, 2002. . They amended that agreement and executed a second contract in 2011 (Contract). Under the Contract, the Sto-ebners agreed to sell to Konrad nine parcels of real estate in Hutchinson and Charles Mix counties. The sales were set to occur on specific dates over the course of several years. The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ethyl Corporation v. United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio-Clc and Local No. 7441, United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio-ClcCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Boise Cascade Corporation v. Paper Allied-Industrial, Chemical and Energy Workers (Pace), Local 7-0159Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- Azcon Construction Co. v. Golden Hills Resort, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- United Food and Commercial Workers, Afl-Cio, Clc, Local No. 88 v. Shop 'N Save Warehouse Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Spiska Engineering, Inc. v. SPM Thermo-Shield, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Stoebner v. KonradSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018