Legal Opinion

Formella v. Ciba-Geigy Corp.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 8, 1980No. Docket 45393PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs brought an action against defendants for injuries and damages sustained as a result of Helen Formella’s taking the drug Tandearil. The complaint alleged malpractice on the part of Dr. Murguz in prescribing the drug. It was further alleged that Ciba-Geigy, the manufacturer and distributor of Tandearil, was jointly and severally liable for plaintiffs injuries by failing to adequately warn Dr. Murguz of the dangers of the drug and by promoting its use.

After the first day of trial, plaintiffs entered into a settlement agreement with Dr. Murguz. He was dismissed from the action and no…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Caldwell v. FoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Smith v. E R Squibb & Sons, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Cody v. Marcel Electric Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Gutowski v. M & R Plastics & Coating, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Thom v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  2. Stahl v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  3. Dunn v. Lederle LaboratoriesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Batteast v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Tongate v. Wyeth LaboratoriesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API