Legal Opinion
Wilkinson v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 7, 1991No. Civ. A. No. 89-55122PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVID A. EZRA, District Judge:
INTRODUCTION
Frank Wilkinson and the National Committee Against Repressive Legislation (“Appellants”) appeal the district court’s order of December 28, 1988 denying their motion to compel further production of documents. Finding that this court has jurisdiction over the matter and that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion, we affirm.
BACKGROUND
The underlying dispute in this case began a decade ago, when appellants sued *557the FBI and various other federal agencies and officials ("Appellees") asserting state and federal constitutional…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- In Re Motion to Compel Filed by Dudley M. Steele, Jr. And Betty L. Kruger, United States of America v. Dudley M. Steele, Jr. And Betty L. KrugerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Callie v. NearCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Mark Green and Corporate Accountability Research Group v. Department of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Diana G. Schlegel and Central Pacific Freight Lines, an Oregon Corporation v. William Bebout and Bob RussellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Angela K. Hagestad v. Roger C. Tragesser v. Oregon State Bar, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- California Department of Social Services v. LeavittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Saldana-Sanchez v. Lopez-GerenaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. CMKM Diamonds, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Luster v. BrinkmanColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.