Legal Opinion
Luster v. Brinkman
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided March 18, 2010No. 09CA0563PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge CASEBOLT.
In this postjudgment proceeding involving attempts to collect a judgment for costs, defendant, Judith M. Brinkman, M.D., through her assignee for collection, COPIC Insurance Company (collectively Brinkman), appeals the trial court's order denying her request for substituted service of C.R.C.P. 69 interrogatories upon plaintiffs, Stacy Luster and Walter Luster. We remand for further proceedings.
I. Facts
The Lusters sued Brinkman for medical malpractice. A jury found for Brinkman, and a division of this court affirmed the judgment on the merits. Luster v. Brink-man, 205…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Harding Glass Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- Motorola, Inc. v. Computer Displays International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Blossom v. The Milwaukee, &C., Railroad CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1864
- Herrscher v. HerrscherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Marks v. GesslerColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
- In re Estate of GadashColorado Court of Appeals · 2017
- People v. RockneColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- Rea v. Corrections Corp. of AmericaColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- Orlando Residence Ltd. v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.