Legal Opinion

California Department of Social Services v. Leavitt

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 25, 2008No. 06-56136PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERZON, Circuit Judge:

In State of California Dep’t of Soc. Servs. v. Thompson, 321 F.3d 835, 856-57 (9th Cir.2003) (referred to as “Rosales,” after intervenor-appellant Enedina Rosales), we rejected a U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) interpretation of the statute determining eligibility for the Aid to Families with Dependent Children-Foster Care (“AFDC-FC”) program. 1 See 42 U.S.C. § 672. We remanded to the district court to implement what we held to be the proper interpretation of the statute. The district court subsequently issued an injunction against HHS and the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Agostini v. FeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Hallett v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. LAL v. CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. Blough v. Holland Realty, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. State of California v. UsepaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  4. Irvine Unified School District v. K. G.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  5. Ormco Corp. v. Align Technology, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2009

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API