Legal Opinion
Urbanus v. Burns
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided April 26, 1939No. Gen. No. 40,607PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke
There is competent evidence to establish that in 1914 plaintiff became engaged to Loretta Burns, in token of which he gave her a diamond ring; that in 1917, their engagement having come to an end, she returned the engagement ring and there ensued a period of estrangement for some six years; that on Christmas Eve, 1921, plaintiff gave Loretta a dinner ring; that on Christmas Eve, 1926, he gave her a wrist watch; that on Christmas Eve, 1927, he gave her an onyz ring; that on Christmas Eve, 1928, he gave her a diamond ring; that on June 1, 1935, Loretta Burns died intestate leaving her surviving…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Rockafellow v. NewcombIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
- Schultz v. DuitzCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
3Cited by7 opinions
- Harris v. DavisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- In Re HeckUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2006
- Cohen v. Bayside Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1970
- Ludeau v. Phœnix Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1947
- In Re Lowe EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.