Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Heck

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas

Decided October 24, 2006No. 19-40190PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION DETERMINING: (1) ENGAGEMENT RING IS NOT PROPERTY OF THE ESTATE, (2) DEBTOR DOES NOT HAVE SUFFICIENT REGULAR INCOME TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR CHAPTER 13 OR TO PROPOSE A FEASIBLE PLAN, AND (3) THE CASE MUST BE RE-CONVERTED TO CHAPTER 7

DALE L SOMERS, Bankruptcy Judge.

This matter is before the Court for decision following an evidentiary hearing on July 27, 2006. The issues at that hearing were (1) whether an engagement ring is property of the Debtor’s bankruptcy estate; (2) if the ring is property of the estate, what is its value; (3) whether the Debtor’s Chapter 13 plan can be confirmed; and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Integrated Solutions, Inc. v. Service Support Specialties, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  3. City of Olathe v. KAR Development Associates, L.P. (In Re KAR Development Associates, L.P.)District Court, D. Kansas · 1995
  4. Heiman v. ParrishSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  5. Cedar Rapids Meats, Inc. v. Hager (In Re Cedar Rapids Meats, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re WarkUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2015
  2. Austin v. BankowskiDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
  3. In re DeutschUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2015
  4. In re LoomisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2013
  5. In re PageUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API