Legal Opinion

Cohen v. Bayside Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1970PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarold Tessler, J.

The fundamental question presented to this court in an agreed statement of facts submitted by the parties is: “ Can an engagement ring, given in contemplation of marriage, be recovered from a 1 donee ’, by the estate of the ‘ donor ’, when the contemplated marriage fails to occur because of the death of the ‘ donor The undisputed facts can be summarized as follows: Richard Alan Rothchild became engaged to be married to Carol Sue Cohen, the plaintiff in this action. Both were over 21 years of age. Richard gave Carol a diamond 1 ‘ engagement ” ring which is valued at $1,000. Shortly before the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Andie v. KaplanNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  2. Josephson v. Dry Dock Savings Institution, MendezNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
  3. Ruehling v. HornungSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Beck v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  5. Wilson v. RiggsNew York Court of Appeals · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Coconis v. Christakis, Belmont County Courts, Ohio1981
  2. Lewis v. PermutCivil Court of the City of New York · 1971
  3. Lipton v. LiptonNew York Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Hahn v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1982
  5. United States v. JacksonArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API