Schultz v. Duitz

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Batliff

Affirming.

There is involved on this motion for an appeal, one diamond ring of the value of $450. The sum involved. is below the' appealable sum as a matter of right, but because the fact that it presents a rather new question for the Kentucky courts, we deem it proper to write an •opinion enunciating the law of the case.

Carl Schultz, appellant herein, and Clara Duitz, appellee,, in November, 1929, became engaged to be mar-, ried. Shortly thereafter, pursuant to a custom, the •origin of which the memory of man runneth not, appellant presented and gave to…