Long v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
DAMICH, Chief Judge.
I. Introduction
This matter is before the court on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Rule 56(b) of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”). Defendant argues that Plaintiffs’ claims for overtime compensation under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 207(a), are precluded because Plaintiffs’ union, on their behalf, entered into a collective bargaining agreement with Plaintiffs’ employer, which covers how Plaintiffs are to be compensated for time spent caring for their assigned canines. In opposition, Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Wright v. Universal Maritime Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Metropolitan Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.