United States v. Dansker
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
*485OPINION SUR DENIAL OF REHEARING EN BANC
2Per curiam
Defendants were convicted under a three count indictment charging conspiracy to violate the Travel Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1952, and substantive offenses under that statute. After argument and briefing, the district court in a detailed opinion denied motions for judgments of acquittal and for a new trial. On a prior appeal to this Court, defendants contended that the government had committed a Brady violation in failing to disclose the existence of a witness named James Silver and communications made by him to the prosecution.
We affirmed the convictions on one…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Hensley v. Municipal Court, San Jose-Milpitas Judicial Dist., Santa Clara Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. DanskerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- United States ex rel. Wojtycha v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Michael Newman, Honorable Edward Dumbauld, NominalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
4Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. Richard KellyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- United States v. TurnerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1979
- United States v. DanskerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- United States v. William T. Smith, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Paul E. Bell, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.