Legal Opinion

United States v. Dansker

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 15, 1977No. Nos. 77-1751 — 77-1753 and 77-1761, 77-1762PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*485OPINION SUR DENIAL OF REHEARING EN BANC

2Per curiam

Defendants were convicted under a three count indictment charging conspiracy to violate the Travel Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1952, and substantive offenses under that statute. After argument and briefing, the district court in a detailed opinion denied motions for judgments of acquittal and for a new trial. On a prior appeal to this Court, defendants contended that the government had committed a Brady violation in failing to disclose the existence of a witness named James Silver and communications made by him to the prosecution.

We affirmed the convictions on one…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hensley v. Municipal Court, San Jose-Milpitas Judicial Dist., Santa Clara Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. United States v. DanskerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  3. United States ex rel. Wojtycha v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  4. United States v. Michael Newman, Honorable Edward Dumbauld, NominalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972

4Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. Richard KellyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
  2. United States v. TurnerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1979
  3. United States v. DanskerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  4. United States v. William T. Smith, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  5. United States v. Paul E. Bell, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API