Legal Opinion
United States v. Michael Newman, Honorable Edward Dumbauld, Nominal
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 24, 1972No. 71-1998PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judge.
This ease is before the court on Petition For A Writ of Mandamus to compel the district court to vacate an order granting a new trial in a criminal case on the basis that this order was entered not for reasons in defendant’s timely New Trial Motion but on grounds raised by the district court months after such motion, and Answer to such Petition. 1
Defendant filed a Motion for New Trial promptly after the jury returned its verdict of guilty, alleging 14 reasons for new trial, and three months later argument was heard on this Motion. Approximately 4y2…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. Nicholas A. StironeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
- Rearick v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Rapp v. Van DusenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Jack Holland Anthony v. United States of America, Jack Holland Anthony v. United States v. Vernon v. Sisney, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
- Zaragosa v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- United States v. QuintanillaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Douglas KennedyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Ray J. Beran and Andrew Kaminski, A/K/A Andrew M. KaminskiCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.