Legal Opinion
Blair v. NYNEX Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 8, 1998PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barry Salman, J.), entered October 15, 1996, which, inter alia, granted defendant’s cross motion to dismiss the action without prejudice to recommencement after plaintiff exhausts his administrative remedies, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff purports to represent a class of those persons who have been charged five cents by a pay telephone for additional time on a call, but have paid a greater amount because they did not have the correct change, and because the pay telephones are mechanically unable to provide refunds or to credit the caller…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Jacob Goodman & Co. v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1955
- Jacob Goodman & Co. v. New York Telephone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- International Condominium Corp. v. New York Telephone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
3Cited by2 opinions
- Statistical Phone Philly v. Nynex Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Cincotta v. Verizon Communication, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2017