Legal Opinion

Ferris v. City of Las Vegas

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1980No. 11908PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Appellant owns two houses in an area zoned R-l (residential). Since the early 1950’s, appellant has used the driveway between the two houses as a means of ingress to and egress from his business, Ed Ferris Automotive Center. Appellant also has used the rear yards to park and store vehicles being serviced at his business. Pursuant to its zoning ordinances, 1 the city brought an action to enjoin appellant’s alleged commercial uses of his R-l property. The district court granted the injunction, and this appeal followed.

1. Appellant first contends that there is insufficient evidence to…

3Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Shakey's Incorporated v. MartinIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
  2. South Shore Homes Ass'n v. Holland Holiday'sSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  3. Franklin v. Bartsas Realty, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1979
  4. City of Providence v. First National Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1965
  5. Botchlett v. City of BethanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  2. Teachers Insurance & Annuity Ass'n v. FurlottiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. Mountain Hill, L.L.C. v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
  4. Fernhoff v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1984
  5. City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API