Legal Opinion
Fernhoff v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided November 30, 1984No. CV-R-83-431-ECRPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
EDWARD C. REED, Jr., District Judge.
Plaintiff initiated this action by filing a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in a Nevada State court. His prayer for relief asks for a declaration that Defendant .(TRPA) has no jurisdiction over him and, therefore, is precluded from prohibiting the completion of his parcel development and roadway. Plaintiff, in the alternative, requests a writ of mandamus requiring TRPA to issue all permits necessary for the completion of the development project.
TRPA removed the case to this Court on the basis of federal question jurisdiction. It…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. International Building Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Russian Hill Improvement Ass'n v. Board of Permit AppealsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Board of County Commissioners v. CMC of Nevada, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1983
- Paradise Palms Community Ass'n v. Paradise HomesNevada Supreme Court · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- James Fernhoff v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, and Does I-XxCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Fernhoff v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1985
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. County of ClarkDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1999