Legal Opinion

Pellegrino v. O'Neill

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 17, 1984No. 12369PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.

The principal issue ultimately involved in this case is whether the judiciary, in order to implement the constitutional right to justice without delay in the disposition of civil jury cases, may direct the legislature to appoint additional trial judges for that purpose. We conclude that to do so would violate the basic principle of separation of powers and that the issue of whether a violation of that constitutional right is occurring in this state is nonjusticiable.

The plaintiffs have appealed from the dismissal of their complaint in which they claim that inadequate financing of the state…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Gilligan v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Ex Parte PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. Luther v. BordenSupreme Court of the United States · 1849

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Pamela B. v. MentSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. Barde v. Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  3. State v. MorrillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  4. Doe v. HeintzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  5. Gaines v. MansonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API