Legal Opinion
Minn-Chem, Incorpora v. Agrium Inco
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided June 27, 2012No. 10-1712PublishedCited by 174 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD, Circuit Judge.
Potash, a naturally occurring mineral used in agricultural fertilizers and other products, is produced and sold in a global market. In this case, the plaintiffs, U.S. companies that are direct and indirect purchasers of potash, accuse several global producers of price-fixing in violation of the U.S. antitrust laws. See 15 U.S.C. §§ 1 et seq. The district court denied the defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint, but it certified its ruling for interlocutory appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). We agreed with that court’s assessment of the importance of the issues presented…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by174 opinions
- Cyril Korte v. HHSCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Lotes Co. v. Hon Hai Precision Industry Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Rote v. Zel Custom Manufacturing LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Domanus v. Locke Lord LLPCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Kleen Products LLC v. International Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
169 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.