Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. Ralston Purina Co.
District Court, S.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ROBERT D. MORGAN, District Judge.
This cause comes before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss under 12(b) (3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for lack of venue under 28 U. S.C. § 1400(b). In the complaint, the plaintiff alleges that the defendant has infringed its patent as provided under the patent laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C. §§ 271 and 281. It has long been held that section 1400(b) is the sole and exclusive provision controlling venue in patent infringement actions. See Schnell v. Peter Eckrich & Sons, Inc., 365 U.S. 260, 81 S.Ct. 557, 5 L.Ed.2d 546…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Schnell v. Peter Eckrich & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Knapp-Monarch Co. v. Casco Products Corp. And E.A. Langenfeld Associates, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965
- Grantham v. Challenge-Cook Bros.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
- Union Asbestos & Rubber Company, by Change of Name Unarco Industries, Inc. v. Evans Products CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1964
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lemelson v. Ampex CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1974
- Star Scientific Inc. v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2001
- Joslyn Manufacturing Co. v. Amerace Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
- Kalvar Corporation v. Memorex CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1974