Legal Opinion

Visto Corp. v. Sproqit Technologies, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 17, 2005No. C-04-0651 EMCPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT’S COUNTERCLAIMS (Docket No. 51)

CHEN, United States Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff Visto Corporation has sued Defendant Sproqit Technologies, Inc. for infringement of Visto’s '192 patent. In turn, Sproqit has filed counterclaims against Visto for (1) declaration of noninfringement and invalidity of the '192 patent, (2) declaration of noninfringement and unen-forceability of another patent (the '708 patent), (3) tortious interference with prospective economic advantage, and (4) defamation. In this motion to dismiss, Visto challenges the state…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. In Re Silicon Graphics Inc. Securities Litigation. Edmund J. Janas v. Edward R. McCracken Michael Ramsay Robert K. Burgess Thomas J. Oswald Teruyasu Sekimoto Forest Baskett Stephen Goggiano William M. Kelly Lucille Shapiro Silicon Graphics, Inc., Deanna Brody Andrea S. Donald Israel Buck Ruth Buck Denise Struthers Thomas G. Di Cicco Ira Steven B. Ewall Rosalyn Golaine Jerry Krim Mary Anne Beke Herman Grossman Samuel J. Reiner Dennis Lucas v. Edward R. McCracken Michael Ramsay Robert K. Burgess Thomas J. Oswald Teruyasu Sekimoto Forest Baskett Stephen Goggiano William M. Kelly Lucille Shapiro Silicon Graphics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  3. Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.California Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Bear Stearns & Co.California Supreme Court · 1990

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United Tactical Systems, LLC v. Real Action Paintball, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
  2. Ingrid & Isabel, LLC v. Baby Be Mine, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
  3. v. IresonColorado Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. BRAVE NEW FILMS 501 (C)(4) v. WeinerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2009
  5. Better Meat Co. v. Emergy, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2023

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API