Leeper v. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad
Illinois Supreme Court
Writ of Error to the Appellate Court for the Fourth District;—heard in that court on appeal from the City Court of East St. Louis; the Hon. Benjamin H. Caney, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilkin
On February 25, 1893, a freight train was run by defendant in error on its line from Terre Haute to St. Louis in three sections, called “29,” “29 extra” and “29 second extra.” They were run on the schedule time of 29—a regular train. Each had a conductor, two brakemen and an engineer and fireman. They ran five minutes apart, and were ordered to go on a side-track at Montrose station, so as to allow an east-bound freight train to pass. On reaching that station the first two sections obeyed the order and were standing on the side-track, the engine of 29 extra fifteen or twenty feet from the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Indianapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. MorgensternIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
- Honner v. Illinois Central RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1854
- Harzfeld v. ConverseIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
- Louisville, Evansville & St. Louis Consolidated R. R. v. HawthornIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by6 opinions
- Chicago City Railway Co. v. LeachIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
- Chicago & Alton Railroad v. SwanIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Jackson v. DotsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1909
- Chicago & Alton Railroad v. SwanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1897
- Illinois Central Railroad v. SwisherAppellate Court of Illinois · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.