Legal Opinion

Honner v. Illinois Central Railroad

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1854PublishedCited by 23 opinions

This cause was heard at May term, 1854, of the Cook Circuit Court, Morris, Judge, presiding. A demurrer was sustained to the declaration, and the plaintiff brought the cause to this court.

1Opinion of the CourtCaton, J.

The question in this case arises on a demurrer to the declaration, which was sustained by the court below. The declaration states that the defendants had a turntable with an iron bar attached, for the purpose of turning locomotives and cars, and that the plaintiff, who was in the employ of the defendants, was engaged with the other servants of the defendants in using said turntable and iron bar, and that the said defendants “then and there, by their said agents and servants,so carelessly and improperly made, secured, and guarded and managed the said turntable and iron bar, and the other…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Barbaroux v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1862

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Saldana v. Wirtz Cartage Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Chicago & Northwestern Railroad v. MorandaIllinois Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Chicago & North Western Railroad v. SwettIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. GregoryIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Columbus, Chicago & Indiana Central Railway Co. v. TroeschIllinois Supreme Court · 1873

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API