Legal Opinion

Ogden v. Garrison

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1908No. 15,252PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Harlan county: Ed L. Adams, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Epperson, C.

The'defendant objects to the jurisdiction of this court for the reason that the plaintiff filed no motion for a new trial in the court below. This was a proceeding in equity, and to obtain a review of the case in this court it was unnecessary that a motion for a new trial be filed in the court below. Under the provisions of the code relative to the review of equity cases prior to the amendment of 1905, it was unnecessary to file a motion for a new trial in order to review the case submitted to the lower court. The amendment of 1905 did not change this rule.

In 1898 the defendant…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kerr v. KingsburyMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Bowman v. WrightNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Carlin v. RitterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1888
  4. Friedlander v. RyderNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Hedderich v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Frost v. SchinkelNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Bishop Cafeteria Company of Omaha v. FordNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Springs v. . Refining Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  4. Grand Island Hotel Corp. v. Second Island Development Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Springs v. Atlantic Refining Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API