Bernthal v. City of St. Paul
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
PETERSON, Justice.
The sole issue in this negligence action against the City of St. Paul involves the constitutionality of Minn.Stat. § 466.03, subd. 2 (1984), which provides immunity from suit in tort for municipalities when the tort victim is covered by the Workers’ Compensation Act. Plaintiff, Diane Kay Bernthal’s claim against the city is the result of injuries sustained while driving on a St. Paul street, when she drove over a bent, metal signpost which was protruding from the center median. She was hospitalized for the injuries she received when the signpost pierced the bottom of her car…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- F. S. Royster Guano Co. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Gladstone v. Bartlesville Independent School District No. 30Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Lienhard v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Imlay v. City of Lake CrystalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- O'DELL v. Town of Gauley BridgeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
- In Re Estate of TurnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.