Poor Richard's, Inc. v. Stone
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EXUM, Chief Justice.
The issue presented on appeal is whether Article 1, Chapter 127B, regulating businesses dealing in military goods, is unconstitutional under the due process and equal protection provisions of the state and federal constitutions. Concluding that it was unconstitutional, the trial court granted summary judgment for plaintiff and permanently enjoined enforcement of the statute. The Court of Appeals affirmed. We now conclude the statute is constitutional and reverse.
On 1 July 1985 the North Carolina General Assembly enacted Chapter 522 of the 1985 Session Laws, codified as…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- F. S. Royster Guano Co. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Ferguson v. SkrupaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Rhyne v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
- Meads v. North Carolina Department of AgricultureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
- Wayne County Citizens Ass'n for Better Tax Control: Outlaw v. Wayne County Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- State v. JamesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
- City of Asheville v. StateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.