Daley v. Quick
California Supreme Court
Appeal from • an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco granting a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Searls, C.
Appeal from an order granting a new trial.
Plaintiff rented from the defendant, who was the owner thereof, from month to month a portion of the upper floor of a dwelling-house, known and designated as No. 3 Tehama Street, San Francisco, and took possession on or about March 21,1887. Plaintiff continued to occupy the premises as a tenant of the defendant until October 25, 1888, on which last-named day, while in the act of piling three pieces of wood weighing in the aggregate about one hundred and fifty pounds in a woodshed situate upon the upper floor, and contiguous to the rooms…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sieber v. BlancCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Willson v. TreadwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by19 opinions
- Gagne v. BertranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Burks v. BlackmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- De Motte v. ArkellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Hassell v. DenningCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Nelson v. MyersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.