Legal Opinion

De Motte v. Arkell

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 28, 1926No. Docket No. 3064PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

Action by plaintiffs for damages on account of the death of William H. De Motte alleged to be due to the negligence of the defendant. Plaintiffs had judgment and the defendant appeals.

The record shows that sóme time during the year 1913 the defendant became the owner of a certain building situated in the city of Turlock, county of Stanislaus, commonly known as “Broadway Hall”; that on or about the first day of October, 1920, the defendant leased the second story of said building, together with the appurtenances thereto, to the Turlock Lodge of Independent Order of Odd Fellows for a term of…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Baxter v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Van Every v. OggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Sieber v. BlancCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Brewster v. DeFremeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Glain v. SparandeoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Merrill v. BuckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Neuber v. Royal Realty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Roessler v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
  4. Newman v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Security-First National Bank v. CooperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API