Willson v. Treadwell
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the . city and county of San Francisco, and from an orderi refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court,
1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.
This is an action by an employee of a tenant of business property, against the- landlord, for *59damages for personal injuries resulting from a defective stairway on the premises, used in conducting the business of the tenant. The controlling question in the case is, whether or not the landlord was legally bound to make necessary repairs. There was no covenant in the lease to that effect. This question was ruled against the defendant in the court below, and verdict and judgment went against her." At common law the landlord was not bound to make repairs, and the tenant alone was liable to third…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- City of Brooklyn v. . Brooklyn City R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Van Every v. OggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Marshall v. HeardTexas Supreme Court · 1883
3Cited by17 opinions
- Harris (Et Ux.) v. Lewistown Tr. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Burner v. Higman & Skinner Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Morgan v. SheppardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
- Newman v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
- Bianchi v. Del ValleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.