Legal Opinion
Hot Springs Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Wallace
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided October 26, 1933No. 3791PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUDSPETH, Justice.
The Hot Springs Plumbing & Heating Company brought suit against Prank Wallace and Pred Standau to foreclose a mechanic’s lien for plumbing work done on a building erected by Standau, as lessee of Wallace, on ground belonging to Wallace, in the sum of $717.93. The Love Lumber Company filed a petition in intervention in this suit, seeking foreclosure of its lien for materials furnished to the defendant in the sum of $747.03. Wallace denied, on information and belief, the allegations of the complaint and of the petition of intervention. Defendant Standau did not appear. The…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Trustees of the German Lutheran Evangelical St. Matthew's Congregation v. HeiseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1876
- North Side Sash & Door Co. v. HechtIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
- McDonald v. RosengartenIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
- Union Trust Co. v. CasserlyMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Kizer Lumber Co. v. MoselySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1892
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Allsop Lumber Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
- Intermountain Electric, Inc. v. G-A-T Bros. Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Intermountain Elec., Inc. v. GAT BROS. CONST., INC.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- State v. HerreraNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
- Home Plumbing and Contracting Company v. PruittNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.