Legal Opinion
Jordan v. Peek
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 19, 1954No. 35366PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.
Plaintiffs amended petition contained three causes of action. It was alleged that they were the owners of a farm described as the northeast quarter of Section 26, Township 14 North, Range 1 West, Oklahoma County, Oklahoma, and that the defendants, Robert M. Jordan and Bay Petroleum Corporation, were and had'been engaged in drilling operations and producing from certain oil and gas wells in Sections 23 and 14, Township 14 North, Range 1 West, Oklahoma County, Oklahoma, being lands located to the north of plaintiffs’ lands, and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pure Oil Co. v. QuarlesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- City of Tulsa v. CreekmoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Keener Oil & Gas Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- City of Holdenville v. KiserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Burden v. StephensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cities Service Oil Company v. MerrittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
- Garland Coal & Mining Co. v. FewCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
- Oltman Homes, Inc. v. MirkesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2008
- Garland Coal & Mining Company v. Clifton FewCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.