Legal Opinion

Enock v. Reifer

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 11, 1981No. 314PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPAETH, Judge:

This action in trespass arises from an automobile accident. The trial judge granted the defendants’ motion for a directed verdict. The plaintiffs filed a motion to remove the directed verdict. On March 19, 1980, after argument, the lower court entered an order stating that “plaintiff’s [sic] motion to remove the directed verdict is denied and the prothonotary is directed to enter judgment on the directed verdict for the defendants upon payment of the verdict fee.” The present appeal is from this order. The appeal must be quashed. The docket discloses that the prothonotary has…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Johnston the Florist, Inc. v. TEDCO Construction Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Ryan v. GAF Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Johnston the Florist, Inc. v. TEDCO Construction Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Ryan v. Gaf Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Margolis v. KlingerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API