Legal Opinion
Ryan v. Gaf Corp.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided May 16, 1995PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAVANAUGH, Judge:
Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation (“OCF”) appeals from an order which denied its motion for post-trial relief. We remand with instructions.
*828The procedural history of this case can be summarized as follows. Following a jury trial, a verdict was returned in favor of plaintiffs and against OCF and Owens-Illinois, Inc.1 Post-verdict motions were filed, but the trial court entered judgment in favor of plaintiffs and against OCF and Owens-Illinois, without first disposing of these motions. Both OCF and Owens-Illinois appealed. On appeal, this Court vacated the trial court’s entry…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Johnston the Florist, Inc. v. TEDCO Construction Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Crosby v. Com., Dept. of Transp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Grove North America, Division of Kidde Industries, Inc. v. Arrow Lift & Construction Equipment Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Davanzo v. FinelliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Basalyga v. HohenseeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- El Bey v. Moorish Science Temple of America, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Ryan v. GAF Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995