Legal Opinion

Ryan v. GAF Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 16, 1995PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAVANAUGH, Judge:

Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation (“OCF”) appeals from an order which denied its motion for post-trial relief. We remand with instructions.

*844The procedural history of this case can be summarized as follows. Following a jury trial, a verdict was returned in favor of plaintiffs and against OCF and Owens-Illinois, Inc.1 Post-verdict motions were filed, but the trial court entered judgment in favor of plaintiffs and against OCF and Owens-Illinois, without first disposing of these motions. Both OCF and Owens-Illinois appealed. On appeal, this Court vacated the trial court’s entry…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Johnston the Florist, Inc. v. TEDCO Construction Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Crosby v. Com., Dept. of Transp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Grove North America, Division of Kidde Industries, Inc. v. Arrow Lift & Construction Equipment Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Davanzo v. FinelliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Basalyga v. HohenseeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Carr, H. v. Michuck, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  2. Hosler, B. v. Tweedlie, G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  3. Huston, M. v. Summerhill, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Multicultural Wellness Center v. Tipico RestaurantSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  5. Pechin Leasing, L.L.C. v. Brumage, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API