Ryan v. GAF Corp.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CAVANAUGH, Judge:
Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation (“OCF”) appeals from an order which denied its motion for post-trial relief. We remand with instructions.
*844The procedural history of this case can be summarized as follows. Following a jury trial, a verdict was returned in favor of plaintiffs and against OCF and Owens-Illinois, Inc.1 Post-verdict motions were filed, but the trial court entered judgment in favor of plaintiffs and against OCF and Owens-Illinois, without first disposing of these motions. Both OCF and Owens-Illinois appealed. On appeal, this Court vacated the trial court’s entry…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Johnston the Florist, Inc. v. TEDCO Construction Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Crosby v. Com., Dept. of Transp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Grove North America, Division of Kidde Industries, Inc. v. Arrow Lift & Construction Equipment Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Davanzo v. FinelliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Basalyga v. HohenseeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Carr, H. v. Michuck, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Hosler, B. v. Tweedlie, G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
- Huston, M. v. Summerhill, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Multicultural Wellness Center v. Tipico RestaurantSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Pechin Leasing, L.L.C. v. Brumage, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.