Legal Opinion

ROOD EX REL. RICHARDS v. Coos County

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 29, 2010No. 08CV0537; A141994PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

After the trial court denied plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment and granted defendants’ motions, it entered a judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ declaratory judgment, impairment of contract, and promissory estoppel claims that concerned their right, after the enactment of Ballot Measure 49 (2007), to develop property pursuant to waivers issued by defendants under Ballot Measure 37 (2004). Plaintiffs appeal that judgment. A statement of facts would not benefit the bench, the bar, or the public. For the reasons that we explain, we vacate the judgment, in part, and remand with…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Clackamas County v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Doe v. Medford School District 549CCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  3. Friends of Yamhill County, Inc. v. Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  4. Kleikamp v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  5. Advance Resorts of America, Inc. v. City of WheelerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. ROOD EX REL. RICHARDS v. Coos CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API