Legal Opinion

Luethe v. Multnomah County

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 29, 2010No. 060909466; A138836PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.

This is another case requiring us to consider the meaning and application of Measure 49, the referendum that replaced Measure 37 and altered its remedies for reduction in property value caused by a land use regulation. Plaintiffs, who filed suit seeking compensation under Measure 37, appeal the subsequent dismissal of that suit on mootness grounds precipitated by the enactment of Measure 49. On appeal, they advance two general arguments: (1) they have a “vested right” in their “cause of action for compensation” under Measure 37 and, if Measure 49 operates retroactively to abolish that right,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lochner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Smothers v. Gresham Transfer, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Corey v. Department of Land Conservation & DevelopmentOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  4. DeMendoza v. HuffmanOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Hall v. Northwest Outward Bound School, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Curry v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  2. Curry v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  3. Luethe v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API