Legal Opinion

Northwest Greentree, Inc. v. Cervantes-Ochoa

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 20, 1992No. 89-13027; CA A67870PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

Employer seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order holding that it is a subject Oregon employer and that claimant was a subject Oregon employee at the time that he sustained a compensable injury. We affirm.

Employer is a reforestation company, licensed and bonded in both Oregon and Washington. It contracts to do work in both states. All of its employees live in the mid-Willamette Valley and report to work at employer’s headquarters in Monmouth, Oregon. From Monmouth, they are transported in employer’s vehicles to remote job sites for a few days at a time and then back to Monmouth.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kolar v. B & C CONTRACTORSCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  2. Phelan v. H.S.C. Logging, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  3. Power Master, Inc. v. BlanchardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  4. Power Master, Inc. v. National Council on Compensation InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  5. Hobson v. Ore Dressing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Berkey v. Department of Insurance & FinanceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  2. Carothers v. Robert Westlund ConstructionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  3. Nelson v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  4. Saif Corp. v. MoeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. Haney v. Union Forest ProductsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API