Northwest Greentree, Inc. v. Cervantes-Ochoa
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.
Employer seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order holding that it is a subject Oregon employer and that claimant was a subject Oregon employee at the time that he sustained a compensable injury. We affirm.
Employer is a reforestation company, licensed and bonded in both Oregon and Washington. It contracts to do work in both states. All of its employees live in the mid-Willamette Valley and report to work at employer’s headquarters in Monmouth, Oregon. From Monmouth, they are transported in employer’s vehicles to remote job sites for a few days at a time and then back to Monmouth.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kolar v. B & C CONTRACTORSCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- Phelan v. H.S.C. Logging, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- Power Master, Inc. v. BlanchardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- Power Master, Inc. v. National Council on Compensation InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Hobson v. Ore Dressing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
3Cited by7 opinions
- Berkey v. Department of Insurance & FinanceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- Carothers v. Robert Westlund ConstructionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Nelson v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- Saif Corp. v. MoeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Haney v. Union Forest ProductsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.