Legal Opinion

Power Master, Inc. v. Blanchard

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 26, 1990No. WCB 87-05652; CA A60351PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

Employer seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order setting aside its denial of, a claim. The issue is whether claimant is a “worker employed in this state” within the meaning of ORS 656.126(1) or is, instead, an out-of-state employee who is not covered by the Oregon Workers’ Compensation Law. The Board concluded that claimant is an Oregon worker. We agree and affirm.

Employer is an Oregon corporation with its headquarters in Portland. It has what it calls “operations offices” in Louisiana, California, Texas, Washington and Utah. It had an operations office in Portland until…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kolar v. B & C CONTRACTORSCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  2. Phelan v. H.S.C. Logging, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  3. Hobson v. Ore Dressing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Northwest Greentree, Inc. v. Cervantes-OchoaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. Power Master, Inc. v. National Council on Compensation InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. Nelson v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  4. Saif Corp. v. MoeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. SAIF Corp. v. MoeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API