Legal Opinion

Haney v. Union Forest Products

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 6, 1994No. 89-05193, 89-07725, 89-05194; CA A74342Published

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board affirming the referee’s denial of benefits on the basis of its finding that at the time of the injury, claimant was working temporarily in Oregon for a Washington employer and, therefore, was not an Oregon subject worker. We affirm.

Claimant sustained a low back injury in 1987 while working in Oregon for Union Forest Products (UFP). At that time, he missed less than three days of work, and the injury was accepted as nondisabling. However, he continued to experience low back pain and a “bruised” sensation in that area. In…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Phelan v. H.S.C. Logging, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  2. Northwest Greentree, Inc. v. Cervantes-OchoaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. Bowers v. MathisOregon Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API