Kroon v. Maxwell
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
This case began as a suit by plaintiff against two of the signers of a promissory note. The defendants filed a third party complaint against the other cosigners of the note. After trial the district judge made findings of fact and entered judgment in favor of the plaintiff against the defendants on the note and in their favor as third party plaintiffs against Thacher and Sherman Car Wash Equipment Company for the amounts which the third party plaintiffs were required to pay to satisfy the plaintiff’s judgment against them.1 These third party defendants have taken this…
3Cases cited1 opinion
- Kroon v. MaxwellDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1969
4Cited by1 opinion
- Gerald F. Kroon v. Lloyd R. Maxwell and Caroline Maxwell v. Maxwell Sales & Engineering Co., a Delaware Corporation, Sherman Car Wash Equipment Company, a Michigan Corporation and F. William Thacher, Jr. (Third-Party Defendants) F. William Thacher, Jr. And Sherman Car Wash Equipment Co., (Third-Party Defendants)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970