Legal Opinion

Kroon v. Maxwell

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 25, 1970No. 18062PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

This case began as a suit by plaintiff against two of the signers of a promissory note. The defendants filed a third party complaint against the other cosigners of the note. After trial the district judge made findings of fact and entered judgment in favor of the plaintiff against the defendants on the note and in their favor as third party plaintiffs against Thacher and Sherman Car Wash Equipment Company for the amounts which the third party plaintiffs were required to pay to satisfy the plaintiff’s judgment against them.1 These third party defendants have taken this…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kroon v. MaxwellDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1969

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gerald F. Kroon v. Lloyd R. Maxwell and Caroline Maxwell v. Maxwell Sales & Engineering Co., a Delaware Corporation, Sherman Car Wash Equipment Company, a Michigan Corporation and F. William Thacher, Jr. (Third-Party Defendants) F. William Thacher, Jr. And Sherman Car Wash Equipment Co., (Third-Party Defendants)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API