Legal Opinion

Sherman Car Wash Equipment Co. v. Maxwell

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 17, 1969No. Civ. A. No. 36133PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KRAFT, District Judge.

This is a suit against the defendants1, who are two of three guarantors upon a written guaranty ' agreement. The third guarantor is F. William Thacher, Jr.2, who is president of the corporate plaintiff and was formerly treasurer and one of the directors of Maxwell Sales and Engineering Company, (Maxwell Sales).

In our opinion filed contemporaneously in a companion action (Kroon v. Maxwell, D.C., 297 F.Supp. 277), the identities and relationships of the parties and the corporations involved are fully set forth and are now incorporated herein.3

The plaintiff seeks to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wheeling Steel Corp. v. NeuCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
  2. Kroon v. MaxwellDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1969
  3. Weiskircher v. VolkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. U.S. Suzuki Motor Corp. v. JohnsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Teledyne Mid-America Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Hoh Corporation, a Hawaii CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  3. Massey-Ferguson, Inc. v. Finocchiaro Equipment Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API