Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ayers v. City of Cleveland

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 16, 2017No. 105074Published

1Dissent

MARY EILEEN KILBANE, P.J., DISSENTING:

{¶ 51} I respectfully dissent. I would affirm the judgment of the trial court and proceed to address Ayers's cross-claim.

{¶ 52} Ayers was convicted in December 2000. After suffering over a decade of wrongful imprisonment, Ayers prevailed on his federal habeas corpus claims and was released from prison in 2011. He subsequently prevailed in a federal action against Kovach and Cipo for violating his civil rights. The district court originally dismissed his claim against the City for statutory indemnification, finding it was premature until a judgment was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Ohio Pyro, Inc. v. Ohio Department of CommerceOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State ex rel. Cincinnati Post v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Piro v. Franklin TownshipOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Grey v. Walgreen Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API