State ex rel. Cincinnati Post v. City of Cincinnati
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.
We hold that the Cincinnati City Council’s back-to-back meetings, which, taken together, were attended by a majority of council members, violated the provisions of R.C. 121.22, that the dictates of R.C. 121.22 are applicable to Cincinnati City Council, and that the Cincinnati Post is entitled to its requested relief.
Ohio’s “Sunshine Law,” R.C. 121.22, requires that public officials, when meeting to consider official business, conduct those meetings in public. The statute reads:
“(A) This section shall be liberally construed to require public officials to take official action and to conduct all…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. S.R.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
- State ex rel. Fairfield Leader v. RickettsOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State ex rel. Brown v. Milton-Union Exempted Village Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1988
3Cited by74 opinions
- State ex rel. Sinay v. SoddersOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State ex rel. Besser v. Ohio State UniversityOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State ex rel. Calvary v. Upper ArlingtonOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Yonkings v. WilkinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- State ex rel. Long v. Council of the VillageOhio Supreme Court · 2001
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.