Legal Opinion

Piro v. Franklin Township

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 24, 1995No. 16929PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Slaby, Judge.

Joseph E. Piro appeals from summary judgment granted in favor of the appellees, Franklin Township, the Franklin Township Police Department, Ronald Fuchs, William Endres and Daniel Davidson. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Piro was a third-year law student at the University of Akron at the time of the events giving rise to this case. He enjoyed hunting; to this end, he had sought and received the permission of Bobby Ray Holland, a Franklin Township landowner, to erect two metal tree stands on Holland’s property. Piro claimed that each stand was worth at least $350.

In October…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Yeager v. Local Union 20, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Turner v. TurnerOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Thompson v. McNeillOhio Supreme Court · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. James G. Jackson v. City of Columbus, Gregory Lashutka, Thomas W. Rice, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  2. Mercer v. HalmbacherOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Moss v. Lorain County Board of Mental RetardationOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Hackathorn v. PreisseOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Shoup v. DoyleDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API