Legal Opinion

Amini Innovation Corp. v. McFerran Home Furnishings, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California

Decided December 12, 2014No. CV 13-6496 RSWL (SSx)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER Re: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [46]

RONALD. S.W. LEW, Senior District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Currently before the Court is Defendants McFerran Home Furnishings, Inc. And *1172Sharon Lin’s Motion for Summary Judgment [46]. The Court, having reviewed all papers and arguments submitted pertaining to this Motion, NOW FINDS AND RULES AS FOLLOWS: The Court DENIES Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment.

II. DISCUSSION

A. Legal Standard

Motion for Summary Judgment

Summary judgment is appropriate when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Samara Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Merlin Hansen Dolores Hansen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  5. Levi Strauss & Co., a Delaware Corporation v. Blue Bell, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. LVL XIII Brands, Inc. v. Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  2. Benefit Cosmetics LLC v. E.L.F. Cosmetics, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API