Legal Opinion
Benefit Cosmetics LLC v. E.L.F. Cosmetics, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided December 17, 2024No. 3:23-cv-00861Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 BENEFIT COSMETICS LLC, 10 Case No. 23-cv-00861-RS Plaintiff, 11 v. OPINION AND ORDER 12 E.L.F. COSMETICS, INC., 13 Defendant. 14 15 I. INTRODUCTION 16 Benefit Cosmetics LLC (“Benefit”) claims e.l.f. Cosmetics, Inc. (“e.l.f.”) has infringed on 17 the trademark and trade dress of Benefit’s popular mascara, Roller Lash. This case came on for 18 trial without a jury on August 26, 2024, and concluded on September 3, 2024. The parties then 19 submitted revised proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law before…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Park 'N Fly, Inc. v. Dollar Park & Fly, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Amf Incorporated, a Corporation v. Sleekcraft Boats, a Sole Proprietorship, and Bruce E. Nescher, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entertainment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Clicks Billiards Inc., a Texas Corporation v. Sixshooters Inc., an Arizona Corporation Ronald R. Forbes, a Married Man Jane Doe Forbes, WifeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. Marketing Displays, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.