Legal Opinion
Merlin Hansen Dolores Hansen v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 8, 1993No. 92-55839PublishedCited by 379 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The memorandum disposition filed May 24, 1993, 993 F.2d 882, is redesignated a per curiam opinion for publication.
OPINION
2Per curiam
Merlin and Dolores Hansen appeal pro se the district court’s summary judgment in favor of the United States in the Hansens’ action to quiet title under 28 U.S.C. § 2410. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.
We review de novo a district court’s summary judgment. Hughes v. United States, 953 F.2d 531, 541 (9th Cir.1992). “We must determine, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, whether there are any genuine issues of…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Hughes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Alan R. Marks v. United States of America (Department of Justice)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. 1 Parcel of Real Property, Lot 4, Block 5 of Eaton AcresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
4Cited by379 opinions
- Craig v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2002
- Federal Trade Commission v. Publishing Clearing House, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Emeldi v. University of OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- In Re CanevaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Jones v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
374 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.