Legal Opinion

Kelliher v. Kelliher

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 19, 1950No. Civ. 7679; Civ. 7696PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.

Upon petition of both parties, and because the appeal was heard originally before only two members of the court, a rehearing was granted and the cause set for reargument. After further consideration the court is convinced that the conclusion reached in our previous opinion properly disposes of the issues raised herein, and for that reason we adopt the opinion heretofore rendered except as modified herein:

The present controversy had its inception in an unlawful detainer action filed in the Justice’s Court of O’Neal Township, San Joaquin County, by plaintiff, the divorced husband of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Coyne v. KrempelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Redlands High School District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Gardenswartz v. Equitable Etc. Soc.California Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. Cheney v. TrauzettelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Hardy v. HardyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Co. v. FishCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  2. Family Service Agency of Santa Barbara v. AmesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Albermont Petroleum, Ltd. v. CunninghamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Callahan v. Chatsworth Park, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Jack v. WoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API